|
Portal Instruments
smart, needle-free injection device Smart, Needle Free Injection Device, supplied by Portal Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/smart, needle-free injection device/product/Portal Instruments Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smart, needle-free injection device - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Sutter Instrument Company
borosilicate injection needles Borosilicate Injection Needles, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/borosilicate injection needles/product/Sutter Instrument Company Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
borosilicate injection needles - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
David Kopf Instruments
micro-capillary injection needles Micro Capillary Injection Needles, supplied by David Kopf Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/micro-capillary injection needles/product/David Kopf Instruments Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
micro-capillary injection needles - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Crist Instrument Co
30 gauge injection needle 30 Gauge Injection Needle, supplied by Crist Instrument Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/30 gauge injection needle/product/Crist Instrument Co Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
30 gauge injection needle - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Sutter Instrument Company
backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97 Backfilled Injection Needles With ~2 Opening Sutter Instrument Micropipet Puller Model P 97, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97/product/Sutter Instrument Company Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
KARL STORZ
long laparoscopic needle injection instrument ![]() Long Laparoscopic Needle Injection Instrument, supplied by KARL STORZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/long laparoscopic needle injection instrument/product/KARL STORZ Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
long laparoscopic needle injection instrument - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd
special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g ![]() Special Purpose Laryngeal Injection Needle 18 G, supplied by Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g/product/Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Warner Instruments
injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3 ![]() Injection Needles Warner Instruments 6100tf 3, supplied by Warner Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3/product/Warner Instruments Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Portal Instruments
portal prime needle-free jet injection system ![]() Portal Prime Needle Free Jet Injection System, supplied by Portal Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/portal prime needle-free jet injection system/product/Portal Instruments Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
portal prime needle-free jet injection system - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Diagnostic Instruments Inc
ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7 ![]() Ultrasound Needle Guided Injection Systems Mindray Msk M7, supplied by Diagnostic Instruments Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7/product/Diagnostic Instruments Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Warner Instruments
borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles ![]() Borosilicate Glass Microcapillary Injection Needles, supplied by Warner Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles/product/Warner Instruments Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Sutter Instrument Company
injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d ![]() Injection Needles Sutter Instruments; Borosilicate Glass With Filaments; O.D, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d/product/Sutter Instrument Company Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d - by Bioz Stars,
2026-03
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fluid instillation compared to no fluid instillation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Intraperitoneal drain compared to no intraperitoneal drain for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Subdiaphragmatic intraperitoneal local anaesthetic compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Control, Diagnostic Assay, Comparison, Saline
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Local anaesthetic to peritoneal cavity (not subdiaphragmatic) compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Control, Comparison, Saline
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Warmed, or warmed and humidified CO 2 compared to unwarmed and unhumidified CO 2 for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Comparison
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gasless laparoscopy compared to CO 2 insufflation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Comparison, Control
Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2
Figure Lengend Snippet:
Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long
Techniques: Control, Clinical Proteomics