injection needles sutter instruments Search Results


90
Portal Instruments smart, needle-free injection device
Smart, Needle Free Injection Device, supplied by Portal Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/smart, needle-free injection device/product/Portal Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
smart, needle-free injection device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sutter Instrument Company borosilicate injection needles
Borosilicate Injection Needles, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/borosilicate injection needles/product/Sutter Instrument Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
borosilicate injection needles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
David Kopf Instruments micro-capillary injection needles
Micro Capillary Injection Needles, supplied by David Kopf Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/micro-capillary injection needles/product/David Kopf Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
micro-capillary injection needles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Crist Instrument Co 30 gauge injection needle
30 Gauge Injection Needle, supplied by Crist Instrument Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/30 gauge injection needle/product/Crist Instrument Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
30 gauge injection needle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sutter Instrument Company backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97
Backfilled Injection Needles With ~2 Opening Sutter Instrument Micropipet Puller Model P 97, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97/product/Sutter Instrument Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
backfilled injection needles with ~2 opening sutter instrument micropipet puller model p-97 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
KARL STORZ long laparoscopic needle injection instrument
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Long Laparoscopic Needle Injection Instrument, supplied by KARL STORZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/long laparoscopic needle injection instrument/product/KARL STORZ
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
long laparoscopic needle injection instrument - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Special Purpose Laryngeal Injection Needle 18 G, supplied by Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g/product/Nagashima Medical Instruments Co Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
special-purpose laryngeal injection needle 18-g - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Warner Instruments injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Injection Needles Warner Instruments 6100tf 3, supplied by Warner Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3/product/Warner Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
injection needles warner instruments 6100tf-3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Portal Instruments portal prime needle-free jet injection system
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Portal Prime Needle Free Jet Injection System, supplied by Portal Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/portal prime needle-free jet injection system/product/Portal Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
portal prime needle-free jet injection system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Diagnostic Instruments Inc ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Ultrasound Needle Guided Injection Systems Mindray Msk M7, supplied by Diagnostic Instruments Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7/product/Diagnostic Instruments Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ultrasound needle guided injection systems mindray msk m7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Warner Instruments borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Borosilicate Glass Microcapillary Injection Needles, supplied by Warner Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles/product/Warner Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
borosilicate glass microcapillary injection needles - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sutter Instrument Company injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d
Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological <t> laparoscopic </t> procedures
Injection Needles Sutter Instruments; Borosilicate Glass With Filaments; O.D, supplied by Sutter Instrument Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d/product/Sutter Instrument Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
injection needles sutter instruments; borosilicate glass with filaments; o.d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Specific technique compared to standard technique for releasing the pneumoperitoneum for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison

Fluid instillation compared to no fluid instillation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fluid instillation compared to no fluid instillation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison

Intraperitoneal drain compared to no intraperitoneal drain for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Intraperitoneal drain compared to no intraperitoneal drain for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Diagnostic Assay, Comparison

Subdiaphragmatic intraperitoneal local anaesthetic compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Subdiaphragmatic intraperitoneal local anaesthetic compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Control, Diagnostic Assay, Comparison, Saline

Local anaesthetic to peritoneal cavity (not subdiaphragmatic) compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Local anaesthetic to peritoneal cavity (not subdiaphragmatic) compared to control for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Saline

Warmed, or warmed and humidified CO 2 compared to unwarmed and unhumidified CO 2 for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Warmed, or warmed and humidified CO 2 compared to unwarmed and unhumidified CO 2 for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Comparison

Gasless laparoscopy compared to CO 2 insufflation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological  laparoscopic  procedures

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gasless laparoscopy compared to CO 2 insufflation for the reduction of shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Comparison, Control

Journal: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Article Title: Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011101.pub2

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to confirm given no access to protocol and unable to contact study authors Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified Open in a separate window Suginami 2009 Methods Study : single‐centre RCT Country : Thailand Type of surgery : elective laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological problems including TLH, myomectomy, salpingo‐oophorectomy, ovarian cystectomy, salpingectomy and adhesiolysis, performed by 4 laparoscopic surgeons Number and type of laparoscopic ports : not described Distention medium and pressures : not described Study duration : 6 months Informed consent : yes Funding sources : not described Participants 158 women randomised: 79 in intervention group, 79 in control group Participants excluded : none described Age (years, mean ± SD): intervention group: 42.2 ± 10.2, control group: 39.5 ± 8.6 BMI (kg/m 2 , mean ± SD): intervention group: 21.5 ± 3.0, control group: 22.6 ± 4.2 Ethnicity : not described Inclusion criteria Female ASA physical status classification of 1‐2 Undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Exclusion criteria Undergoing emergency gynaecological laparoscopic surgery Contraindications to local anaesthetic, opioids and sulphonamides Medical history of asthma, hepato‐renal and cardiovascular disease Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Operating time > 3 h Interventions Intervention : 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 3 mg morphine was injected intraperitoneally into both subdiaphragmatic surfaces by using a long laparoscopic needle injection instrument (Karl‐Storz, Germany) under direct vision with the participant in deep Trendelenburg position.

Techniques: Control, Clinical Proteomics